Bring the World of Work Into Primary School, Milburn Tells Ministers
Children as young as four should begin learning about careers during their earliest years in the classroom, according to a former government minister who has spent months examining
Children as young as four should begin learning about careers during their earliest years in the classroom, according to a former government minister who has spent months examining why so many young people in the UK end up disconnected from work, education and training.
Alan Milburn, who previously served as a minister under Labour, has recommended that career awareness become part of the primary curriculum, arguing that pupils need their horizons broadened long before they reach the age when formal careers guidance currently begins. His proposals form part of a major independent review into youth activity that was commissioned by the government and is due to be completed later this year.
Speaking to the BBC, Milburn framed the primary-school element of his plan as a gentle introduction rather than a push towards early specialisation. The aim, he suggested, is to help children understand what opportunities exist in the world around them and to show them possibilities they might not otherwise encounter at home. Employers would be invited into schools to give talks and run short taster sessions, giving pupils a first-hand glimpse of different professions.
His most concrete proposal concerns older pupils. Milburn wants work experience to become a mandatory part of education for every 14- to 16-year-old, meaning all students in that age group would spend time in a genuine workplace and receive feedback from their host employer. He described the measure as one that "makes a big difference", pointing to evidence that direct exposure to working environments shapes young people's decisions about their futures.
A central concern behind the recommendation is inequality of access. Milburn noted that roughly four in ten people aged between 14 and 16 currently receive no work experience at all, and that in some schools students are simply told to arrange placements themselves. That approach, he argued, effectively rewards teenagers whose parents have useful contacts and penalises those who do not, turning a supposedly universal opportunity into a privilege determined by family connections.
The scale of the problem Milburn is trying to address is considerable. Figures published by the Office for National Statistics indicate that around 981,000 people aged 16 to 24 across the UK were not in education, employment or training between April and June 2026. This group, commonly referred to as Neet, represents a substantial share of the younger workforce and has been a persistent source of concern for successive governments.
What makes Milburn's analysis notable is his contention that the path towards becoming Neet frequently begins long before a young person's sixteenth birthday. While recent policy attention has concentrated on apprenticeships and work experience for students in Years 10 and 11, he argues that disengagement often takes root during the primary years, when children form their first impressions about what they are capable of and what the adult world holds for them.
Under the current system in England, careers guidance is a requirement for students aged 11 to 18, but work experience carries no statutory status. The government has stated its ambition to guarantee two weeks of work experience for every young person in England, though the mechanism for delivering that promise has yet to be fully set out. Milburn's recommendations would go further by embedding workplace exposure into the school timetable as an obligation rather than an option.
Education policy is devolved across the UK, which means the review examines all four nations but its education-specific recommendations apply only to England. In Scotland and Wales, career-based learning is already embedded in the school experience from as early as age three, giving those systems a head start on the kind of approach Milburn is now advocating for English schools.
Teaching unions have responded with a mixture of openness and caution. Paul Whiteman, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, acknowledged the value of bringing professionals into classrooms but warned that primary schools are already operating under "significant pressure". He stressed that any new mandatory requirement must be accompanied by clarity about what would be dropped to make room for it, warning against simply adding to an already crowded workload.
Whiteman also pointed to existing schemes such as Primary Futures, which recruits volunteers from a wide range of professions to visit schools, challenge stereotypes and raise children's aspirations. He said the earlier pupils can connect what they learn in lessons with the possibilities that lie ahead, the better, suggesting that the infrastructure for Milburn's vision partly exists already.
Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, offered broad support for the principle behind the proposals. He said that bringing outside speakers into the classroom can genuinely awaken pupils' motivation and instil a sense of enthusiasm for opportunities beyond school. He did, however, flag a practical obstacle, noting that arranging such experiences can be harder in rural areas where employers are more thinly spread.
Public opinion appears divided. Emma, a grandmother from Kirklees with grandchildren in Years 1, 2 and 4, told the BBC that primary school is too young for careers talks, arguing that children are being encouraged to grow up too quickly and should be allowed simply to be children. Another parent, Zoe, took the opposite view, saying that since everyone eventually has to work, learning about it early spares children from having to pick it up later.
The final instalment of Milburn's government-commissioned review is expected to be published in the autumn, when the full set of recommendations will be set out and ministers will face questions about which of them they intend to adopt. For now, the direction of travel is clear: the debate has shifted from whether careers education should start earlier to how schools can deliver it without buckling under the strain.
Comments (0)